Context
Problem, stakeholders, constraints, success criteria, and claim boundaries.
Project evidence & capability infrastructure
Howthy turns complex, AI-assisted projects into structured Build Records—showing what was attempted, who contributed, which decisions were made, and what the evidence actually supports.
✓ Built for authentic assessment, capability evidence, and AI-transparent project work.
AI & DATA CAPSTONE · REVIEW READY
CURRENT CLAIM
The model prioritises higher-risk cases within a fixed inspection capacity.
LATEST DECISION · D-08
Optimise ranking utility, not failure probability
The available labels support relative prioritisation. They do not support physical-failure probability.
Reviewer note
Claim boundary is well supported.
A Build Record connects the complete evidence chain
The trust gap
AI can now produce convincing reports, code, dashboards, prototypes, and portfolios. The final output alone no longer tells the whole story.
Can you see...
“As producing plausible work becomes easier, proving trustworthy work becomes more valuable.”
The core product
A Build Record is a structured, evolving evidence object—not a polished case study written after the fact.
Problem, stakeholders, constraints, success criteria, and claim boundaries.
Individual responsibilities, human and AI-assisted work, external input, and review.
Assumptions, options, rejected alternatives, rationale, and later corrections.
Repositories, notebooks, sources, designs, tests, feedback, and metrics.
What passed, failed, was simulated, reproduced, reviewed, or remains unsupported.
Results, lessons, reusable assets, replication guidance, and next versions.
How it works
Capture meaningful project events from the tools people already use. Review material claims—not every keystroke.
Built for every decision
Each view answers the questions that matter—without losing the project’s underlying context.
Strengthen authentic assessment, moderation, auditability, and employability evidence.
Explore this viewBuild credible proof of capability, a reusable professional asset, and stronger interview stories.
Explore this viewReview material claims instead of reconstructing a project from scattered files.
Explore this viewUnderstand contribution, judgment, trade-offs, validation, and limitations.
Explore this viewAn honest evidence model
Howthy separates source, validation, review, outcome, and contribution. Strong evidence is visible. So are the boundaries.
Prioritised higher-risk cases.
Reduced operating costs.
A strong claim can be tested and faculty-reviewed while still being limited to a demonstration. Howthy keeps those distinctions clear.
A distinct layer
Howthy does not replace learning, project, or credential systems. It connects the decisions and evidence they leave behind.
Where we start
Howthy begins with complex technical work where decisions, evidence, and claim boundaries matter most.
Designed to connect with the tools where project evidence already lives.
Planned connections are directional, not claims of current availability.
Start focused
Run a focused pilot with one programme, one cohort, and one applied-project workflow.